Scanview scanmate 3000 software

It seems that Daniel, a lot like me, would like an inexpensive scanner that will scan larger-thanmm film and do a good job. A lot of the older hardware being discussed e. Oh yeah, and mounting for drum scanning isn't as quick, easy, or clean as popping a 35mm strip into a desktop scanner's film holder. So even if somebody offered to give me i.

Where does that leave me? Konica Minolta Scan Dual IV for 35mm; Epson for , 6x6, and 4x5; and sending out for drum scans at a pro lab anything from which I want truly high quality. Gee, Dave, troll much? And how is Dave trolling exactly? Because he expresses a different opinion stating different practical considerations?

Wouter Willemse , Aug 14, You need to understand that the best route for everyone is to follow what you do, and that the right solution for everyone is not a drum scanner. Dave is not trolling. His point of view is as valid as yours and might be more useful. If you want top quality, you have to go for drum scans. Nothing comes close to that. If you want high but not top quality, you have to go for a Coolscan. I wouldn't even think of buying one of those given their age.

You can get a Plustek OpticFilm It may be even better than the Nikons. On the other hand, it may turn out much worse. Plustek had prolems with QA and there hasn't yet been indepedent confirmation tha they are over. It isn't batch-friendly. Get an Epson V Some 'copies' manage to get USAF 6. You don't need wet scanning nor OEM holders unless your film is very warped , just learn to use the eprovided ones. Reports of it underperforming often turn out to be operator issues height, selection of wrong lens.

Dmax is of course poor. But it can scan lots of frames on one go. What else do you need? You say you need 3. But how did you get at that number? I don't even know if any of the non-drum film scanners ever built have real 3.

I guess I got a little triggered when Dave started talking about 16 MP digital I don't think the drum scanner route is right for everyone. However, as Antonio puts it, perhaps right for those who want top quality. My only real point in this whole thread was that photographers will often spend a giant amount of money on cameras and lenses and then insist on scrimping for the things that come after.

Today its scanners, but in past years I heard the same argument about not spending money on printers, on PhotoShop, etc. It is unfortunate that all these things are expensive. However, that is the reality of today's world. Of course everyone is welcome to disagree with me, and to follow their own way. I like disagreement.

It's how we learn And they save lots of time in spotting dirty film and don't even think about trying to retouch out netwon rings. But mounting isn't a snap and the video reference here is after all, 25 minutes long so that should give you an idea.

Once you get the hang of it, like anything else , it seems easy. Next in line for quality and ease would probably be Imacon. I think that unless you really need the ultimate quality scan or you are doing this as a service for others or don't have a lot of film to scan, a drum is maybe more work than you'll want to take on and Imacon is the better option. The software is pretty good too.

Well most of the scanners I listed have at least 3. The Polaroid Sprintscan even lists a 4. My main questions were whether an older scanner such as the Flextight II with 14bit colour would still be better than say a newer Pacific Image Primefilm that has 16bit colour albeit at the cost of DMax and the virtual drum etc Anyway, if drum scanners didn't require all the mounting IE if it was as easy to mount as on a flatbed I would consider it, but I don't want to deal with chemicals.

My main questions were whether an older scanner such as the Flextight II with 14bit colour would still be better than say a newer Pacific Image Primefilm And then when you need a really good scan, have a lab do it. The Polaroid SprintScan is a model I've looked at over the years, and I think there's a Microtek that's supposed to be the same machine.

It's probably fairly capable, but any example will be pretty old, they're not easy to find complete and in working condition, and I'm not sure how well they play with modern computers. Last but not least, Andrew is right about those Dmax specifications. If your scanner will really resolve detail relatively cleanly at 3. For example, Fuji says Provia F maxes out at about 3.

Velvia 50 can be somewhat denser, but even at 3. I have to think the scanner claims of 4. Andrew, you may be right--I'm genuinely ignorant and curious--but the linked-to listing is for a just-started auction almost a week remaining. What are the sale prices among the completed listings? Also, the linked-to auction is for one that the seller cannot verify is working and is selling as-is.

In a word, yes. The lens in the Imacon probably cost more than the entire Primefilm scanner! The bit depth too is equally unimportant once you get past 8-bits per color.

It's a bit like saying: I want a digital camera that produces the best image quality , then someone gives you an answer but doesn't tell you what lens will be used. Or sells you that camera with a complete POS of a lens.

That lens is kind of important in terms of the image quality right? That is possible. Might ask the OP what computer systems he has as an existing one might fit the bill. I think they can scan very well and I'm happy to make prints up to about 24"sq from a 6x6 transparency, from that source. Dave, the link provided is either the best deal of the century or a potential ripoff as it's ridiculously low. And that's the key. The budget and some of the scanners under discussion just don't jive. It is kind of pointless to even consider such scanners unless the budget is reasonable.

That brings up Dave's last and critical post. Just what does Daniel want to use the scanner for? IF it's screen presentation, then the budget and some of the scanners under discussion make sense.

IF the scans are for the purpose of digitizing the film such it can be used for all the same purposes it could be using in the analog processing, big prints and the like, repro, stock , then the budget is hugely inadequate. So we probably need Daniel to specify what he hopes to accomplish and based on that, give him some idea if the budget makes any sense at all.

Scanners are a dying, some would say dead market. I saw that Flextight link first! It was a relist because the original buyer disappeared. I just gave away a SprintScan because I couldn't get it to work on my computer, and I'm good at that sort of thing. I didn't want to get an older computer for it, but the quality of the scans was superb.

I think I'm buying an Epson V I've seen some very good results from it--not up to a Coolscan , but not all that far away either. I think 20" is the widest I'll go from , and I have a Nikon 35mm scanner already. It is for screen presentation as well as archiving in case something should happen to the negatives.

Just a note here. I looked at the Flextight scans the OP linked. Suggest looking at this image , and then check out some more of the guy's scans. All from Epson V Those two needs are diametrically opposite! An archive that could replace the film calls for something like a drum scanner using a very high optical resolution.

I'm sure Lenny can add further. A really good scan of high quality could in theory be output to a film recorder and replace the original with nearly the same quality. So if you are serious about having a digital archive, your budget isn't close to being high enough. Any recommendations for a drum scanner that isn't huge and heavy, that can be had for that kind of money?

But they are big and heavy, and i'm running out of space. I'd be hard pressed to call the ScanMate small, you still need to deadicate a 4 foot table to one. That said, I loved mine. IF someone wants to give you one again in the future, take it!

The Flextight takes up far less room. I will keep an eye out for a Scanmate. Probably SCSI? Are there others that would fit the bill small and cheap? Thanks Andrew. I have seen some scanners offered by sellers who never used them themselves, and i think that then even getting a complete unit would be a matter of luck. I've also found a big Dainippon Screen scanner for sale with everything you'd need not too far away 30 minutes from where i live.

I could go pick it up. Would save a lot in shipping fees. But it's kg, so not by myself. And where to put such a beast Now if you can find a Lino Tango scanner, that's one hell of a unit.

I just really don't want to deal with chemicals and then washing the negs SICK safety laser scanners combine know-how and experience with maximum performance Whether mobile or stationary, for area protection or access protection, indoors or outdoors — our comprehensive portfolio offers the right cost-effective package for each and every requirement Using the time-of-flight measurement principle, the compact devices scan their surroundings ….

A view from lowrance structure Scan from hansenfishing. With the advent of multidetector CT, volume acquisition CT has become routine and straightforward to acquire 2 Given considerations of radiation dose, we are able to acquire CT scans at acceptably low doses and include the entire chest 2 The advantage of acquiring a volume acquisition CT is the ability to reconstruct the images entirely in 3 different planes: the ….

Function Image Capture Plus recognizes barcode information printed onto documents and forms to reduce the work of document sorting Outputting an index file of barcode information also enables linking with applications.

Cranial ultrasound scans of the neonate Head ultrasound scans are an integral part of the care of sick newborn infants They are the imaging mode of first choice because of ease of access, cost, good imaging of central structures of the brain ventricles and germinal matrix and of the circulation.

The merge C-Scan is a view from the top of that volume The S-Scans are divided in vertical lines of points Only the point with the highest amplitude along each line is kept The points are displayed on the C-Scan This data analysis is done for the whole volume of data to create the merged C-Scan view Height parameters of the merge C-Scan.

Routinely reformatting computed tomography CT scans to view organs from several different directions may help radiologists improve diagnosis, according to new research from Wake Forest.

Computerized tomography CT scan is a procedure that assists in diagnosing tumors, fractures, bony structures, and infections in the organs and tissues of the body The procedure is also known as computed axial tomography CAT scan.

Axial, coronal, and sagittal CT scan views were obtained routinely as part of the facial trauma workup These views were assessed to determine the status of the nasofrontal ducts The operative findings were also reviewed Results: Five of the 8 patients had displaced anterior and posterior table frontal sinus fractures.

This paper presents two integrated solutions for realistic 3D model acquisition and reconstruction; an early prototype, in the form of a push trolley, and a later prototype in the form of an autonomous robot The systems encompass all hardware and software required, from laser and video data acquisition, processing and output of texture-mapped 3D models in VRML ….

Photo about Sheet with multiple images of the slices of a brain CT scan Image of color, cranium, computerized - Focussed Assessment with Sonography for Trauma FAST scan is a point-of-care ultrasound examination performed at the time of presentation of a trauma patient. It is invariably performed by a clinician, who should be formally trained, and is considered as an 'extension' of the trauma clinical assessment process, to aid rapid decision making.

Various CT scan views display A ground-glass opacities in the bilateral upper lobes axial view , B ground-glass opacities in the bilateral lower lobes axial view , and C ground-glass opacities in the bilateral upper lobes in addition to linear atelectasis in the right lower lobe coronal view. Keyword Suggestions. Show All Similar WebSites. Bing Yahoo Google Amazone Wiki. Scanview sikring. Scanview software.

Scanview systems. AlanKlein Been spending a lot of time on here! I use an Epson V flat bed with my RB67 shots. You can check some of the scan on my link. Good luck. Last edited: Nov 24, You must log in or register to reply here.

Difference between graded and variable. Damn kids Most reactions Similar threads M. Replies 18 Views 1K. Dec 9, mrca. Scanning 35mm films. Replies 38 Views 6K. Oct 25, doobs. Replies 7 Views 25K. Jan 20, vidrazor. Homemade Wet Film Scan?

Replies 7 Views 10K. Replies 4 Views 2K. Jan 21, xypex New Topics. How to make such portrait lightning? Latest: Warhorse 3 minutes ago. People Photography. Pine Warbler Latest: K9Kirk 19 minutes ago. General Gallery. Beyond the Basics. TPF Gallery Photos.